WebAccording to the American Medical Association, who should have the final word on whether to cease the use of extraordinary means to preserve life? a. the physician b. the … Weba. the intentional termination of one's life by another person to relieve pain and suffering. b. the cessation of the employment of “extraordinary means” to prolong one's life. c. intentionally causing a patient's death against the patient's wishes. d. the refusal to treat a patient against the patient's wishes.
HU245 Ethics Unit 4 Seminar – End of Life Issues.docx
Webexpel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture, regardless of whether the person is physically present in the United States. WebThe most extraordinary health problem in contemporary corrections often based on mandatory sentencing, determinate sentencing, and truth in sentencing is: a. HIV/AIDS. … space ukraine
End of Life Decisions: Ordinary versus Extraordinary Means
WebTo further clarify, extraordinary means are “medical procedures which no longer correspond to the real situation of the patient, either because they are by now disproportionate to any expected results or because they impose an excessive burden on the patient and his family.” WebAug 1, 2007 · This is not the sense in which Pius XII spoke of extraordinary means. Everything leads to the conclusion that the first part of the principle enunciated by Pius XII should be applied to patients in a “vegetative state”: in the case of a serious illness, there is the right and the duty to provide the care necessary for preserving health and life. Webextraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family. The advice and judgement of the physician should be freely available to the patient and/or his immediate family. periscolaire louhans