Webb17 jan. 2024 · Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science The size of scientific fields may impede the rise of new ideas. Examining 1.8 billion citations among 90 million papers across 241 subjects, we find a deluge of papers does not lead to turnover of central ideas in a field, but rather to ossification of canon. WebbJames A. Evans We argue that paradigmatic progress may be slowed as scientific fields grow large. This assertion is supported by evidence from citation patterns across 251 fields—over 1...
Publications Knowledge Lab
Webb8 okt. 2024 · When a field of study becomes large enough, its size “may impede the rise of new ideas,” according to Johan S.G. Chu and James A. Evans, in a new paper, “Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Why is this? The authors believe that too many papers published each year in … WebbSlowed canonical progress in large fields of science (PNAS/ Johan S. G. Chu & James A. Evans) Paper: "Examining 1.8 billion citations among 90 million papers across 241 subjects, we find a deluge of papers does not lead to turnover of central ideas in a field, but rather to ossification of canon. click n foods
Bibliographic coupling networks reveal the advantage of …
Webb8 okt. 2024 · These findings suggest that the progress of large scientific fields may be slowed, trapped in existing canon. Policy measures shifting how scientific work is … Webb7 juni 2024 · Robbie Parks will lead a discussion of Chu and Evans, Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science, PNAS October 12, 2024 118 (41) e2024636118. E2C2 will meet on the second (2nd) and fourth (4th) Tuesdays of October [12, 26], November [9, 23 (TG week)], and December [14, (no meeting on the 28th)] from 4PM-5PM. Webb23 feb. 2024 · The recent paper in PNAS by Chu and Evans (1), “Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science,” questions the maxim “more is better” when investing in … clicknfunny 口コミ